Transverse uterine incision closure: One versus two layers
OBJECTIVE: Closure of a low transverse cesarean incision with one layer of suture results in less operating time, better hemostasis, and less infectious morbidity than a two-layer closure. STUDY DESIGN: At our institution 906 women were randomized to closure of a low transverse cesarean incision wit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1992-10, Vol.167 (4), p.1108-1111 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | OBJECTIVE: Closure of a low transverse cesarean incision with one layer of suture results in less operating time, better hemostasis, and less infectious morbidity than a two-layer closure.
STUDY DESIGN: At our institution 906 women were randomized to closure of a low transverse cesarean incision with either one continuous layer of a locking No. 1 chromic suture and a CTX needle (
n = 457) or two continuous layers of No. 1 chromic suture with the first layer locked (
n = 449). The Student
t test, χ
2 test of proportion, and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to compare groups of patients.
RESULTS: A one-layer closure required less operative time, 43.8 versus 47.5 minutes (
p = 0.0003).Fewer additional uterine hemostatic sutures were required in 369 women in whom either the one- (
n = 179) or the two-layer (
n = 190) closure did not achieve hemostasis (
p = 0.046). Endometritis was similar in both groups, 83 (22%) in the one-layer group versus 65 (18%) in the two-layer group (
p = 0.17). In no outcome assessment was the two-layer closure superior to the one-layer closure.
CONCLUSION: We recommend a one-layer closure when its use is anatomically feasible. (
Am J OBstetGYnecol 1992;167:1108–11.) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9378 1097-6868 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0002-9378(12)80048-2 |