Antimicrobials and competitive exclusion
The compatibility of commonly used antimicrobial feed additives with CE treatment are examined. It appears that additives permitted in the U.K. are without effect on CE, with the possible exception of avoparcin. However, a sharp difference has been found with the effect of antimicrobials on CE treat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of food microbiology 1992-03, Vol.15 (3), p.277-279 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The compatibility of commonly used antimicrobial feed additives with CE treatment are examined. It appears that additives permitted in the U.K. are without effect on CE, with the possible exception of avoparcin. However, a sharp difference has been found with the effect of antimicrobials on CE treatment cultures in vitro, and the in vivo effect; and it is postulated that these differences may be accounted for by the fact that the substances may not be ‘caecum available’ in the bird. When effects are observed in the bird they appear to be largely due to dose variation. In the case of adult birds already infected with
Salmonella, the time between completion of antimicrobial treatment and the administration of Broilact
® will be examined; as well as the selection of propriate antimicrobial treatment in infected birds prior to the administration of replacement microflora. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0168-1605 1879-3460 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0168-1605(92)90058-B |