Determinants of left ventricular preload-adjusted maximal power
1 Hydraulics Laboratory, Institute Biomedical Technology, Ghent University, 9000 Gent; 2 Hemodynamic Research Center, University of Liege, 4000 Liege; and 3 Centre for Experimental Surgery and Anaesthesiology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium Maximal left ventricular (LV) hydr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology 2003-06, Vol.284 (6), p.H2295-H2301 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | 1 Hydraulics Laboratory, Institute Biomedical
Technology, Ghent University, 9000 Gent;
2 Hemodynamic Research Center, University of Liege, 4000 Liege; and 3 Centre for Experimental Surgery
and Anaesthesiology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven,
Belgium
Maximal left ventricular (LV)
hydraulic power output (PWR max ), corrected for preload as
PWR max /(V ed ) (where
V ed is the end-diastolic volume and is a constant
coefficient), is an index of LV contractility. Whereas
preload-adjusted maximal power (PAMP) is usually calculated with
= 2, there is uncertainty about the optimal value of ( = 1 for the normal LV and 2 for the dilated LV). The aim of
this work is to study the determining factors of . The data set
consisted of 245 recordings (steady state and vena cava occlusion) in
10 animals in an ischemic heart pig model. The occlusion data
yielded the slope ( E es ; 2.01 ± 0.77 mmHg/ml, range 0.71-4.16 mmHg/ml) and intercept (V 0 ;
11.9 ± 22.6 ml; range 76 to 39 ml) of the end-systolic
pressure-volume relation, and the optimal -factor (assessed by
fitting an exponential curve through the
V ed -PWR max relation) was 1.94 ± 0.88 (range 0.29-4.73). The relation of with V ed was
weak [ = 0.60 + 0.02(V ed );
r 2 = 0.20]. In contrast, we found an
excellent exponential relation between V 0 and [ = 2.16
r 2 = 0.70]. PAMP, calculated from the
steady-state data, was 0.64 ± 0.40 mW/ml 2 (range
0.14-2.83 mW/ml 2 ) with a poor correlation with
E es ( r = 0.30, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0363-6135 1522-1539 1522-1539 |
DOI: | 10.1152/ajpheart.01110.2002 |