Fast track recovery of high risk coronary bypass surgery patients

Objective: Fast track recovery protocols on younger, low risk patients result in shorter hospital stays and decreased costs. However, data is lacking on the impact of these protocols on high risk patients based on an objective scoring system. Methods: In this study, a high risk cohort of patients (E...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery 2003-05, Vol.23 (5), p.678-683
Hauptverfasser: Alhan, Cem, Toraman, Fevzi, Karabulut, Esref Hasan, Tarcan, Sümer, Dağdelen, Sinan, Eren, Nevnihal, Cağlar, Nuri
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: Fast track recovery protocols on younger, low risk patients result in shorter hospital stays and decreased costs. However, data is lacking on the impact of these protocols on high risk patients based on an objective scoring system. Methods: In this study, a high risk cohort of patients (EuroSCORE ≥6, n=158) was compared with a low risk cohort of patients (EuroSCORE 60 min (P=0.03) were the predictors of delayed extubation (≥6 h) in the high risk group. The predictors of extended ICU stay were any red blood cell transfusion (P=0.0001), and peripheral vascular disease (P=0.05). Any red blood cell transfusion was the only predictor for mortality (P=0.02) and readmission to the hospital within the first 30 days (P=0.02) in this cohort of patients. Conclusions: This study confirms the safety and efficacy of fast track recovery protocol among high risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. All patients are basically suitable for fast track recovery and the preoperative risk factors are poor predictors of prolonged ventilation, increased ICU and hospital stay. Red blood cell transfusion is associated with delayed extubation and discharge from the ICU, and increased mortality and hospital readmission rate.
ISSN:1010-7940
1873-734X
DOI:10.1016/S1010-7940(03)00027-7