Antibiotic prophylaxis with cefazolin and gentamicin in cardiac surgery for children less than ten kilograms
Objective: Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended in pediatric cardiac surgery, but no data concerning the current antibiotic regimen were available. Design: Prospective study from April to June 2000. Setting: University hospital operating room and postoperative intensive care unit. Participants: Nin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia 2003-04, Vol.17 (2), p.221-225 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended in pediatric cardiac surgery, but no data concerning the current antibiotic regimen were available. Design: Prospective study from April to June 2000. Setting: University hospital operating room and postoperative intensive care unit. Participants: Nineteen consecutive infants less than 10 kg with normal renal function undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass longer than 30 minutes. Interventions: Intravenous administration of cefazolin, 40 mg/kg, and gentamicin, 5 mg/kg, at induction of anesthesia; followed by cefazolin, 35 mg/kg every 8 hours, and gentamicin, 2 mg/kg every 12 hours, over 48 hours. Measurements and Main Results: Levels of serum antibiotics were measured: cefazolin (microbiologic) and gentamicin (fluorescence immunoassay) with 8 intraoperative and 5 postoperative samplings. Intraoperatively, cefazolin levels decreased from 166 ± 44 (mean ± standard deviation) down to 54 ± 16 μg/mL and gentamicin from 20.8 ± 9.5 down to 5.9 ± 1.5 μg/mL. The postoperative trough levels were 12 ± 7, 15 ± 10, and 19 ± 22 μg/mL for cefazolin and 1.1 ± 0.5, 0.8 ± 0.4, and 0.8 ± 0.9 μg/mL for gentamicin. Conclusions: Antibiotic serum levels are consistent with satisfactory efficacy, but intraoperative gentamicin peak levels appeared too high. © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1053-0770 1532-8422 |
DOI: | 10.1053/jcan.2003.51 |