A Biomechanical Comparison of Headless Tapered Variable Pitch and AO Cortical Bone Screws for Fixation of a Simulated Slab Fracture in Equine Third Carpal Bones

Objective— To compare the mechanical shear strengths and stiffnesses obtained from in vitro testing of a simulated complete third carpal bone (C3) frontal plane radial facet slab fracture (osteotomy) stabilized with either a 4/5 Acutrak (AT) compression screw or a 4.5‐mm AO cortical bone (AO) screw...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary surgery 2003-03, Vol.32 (2), p.167-177
Hauptverfasser: Bueno, Aloisio C. D., Galuppo, Larry D., Taylor, Kenneth T., Jensen, David G., Stover, Susan M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective— To compare the mechanical shear strengths and stiffnesses obtained from in vitro testing of a simulated complete third carpal bone (C3) frontal plane radial facet slab fracture (osteotomy) stabilized with either a 4/5 Acutrak (AT) compression screw or a 4.5‐mm AO cortical bone (AO) screw inserted in lag fashion. Drilling, tapping, and screw insertion torques, forces, and times also were compared between AT and AO implants. Study Design— In vitro biomechanical assessment of site preparation, screw insertion, and shear failure test variables of bone screw stabilized simulated C3 slab fracture in paired cadaveric equine carpi. Sample Population— Eight pairs of cadaveric equine C3 without orthopedic abnormalities. Methods— Standardized simulated C3 slab fractures were repaired with either AO or AT screws (AO/C3 and AT/C3 groups, respectively). Drilling, tapping, and screw insertion torques, forces, and times were measured with a materials testing machine for each screw type. Repaired specimens were tested in axially oriented shear until failure. Paired Students t‐tests were used to assess differences between site preparation, screw insertion, and shear testing variables. Significance was set at P < .05. Results— There were no significant differences in bone fragment measurements of the standardized simulated C3 slab fractures created for AO or AT screws. There were no significant differences for mean and maximum drilling torques; however, the tapered AT drill had greater maximum drilling force compared with the 3.2‐mm and 4.5‐mm AO drill bits. Mean insertion torque and force measured from the self‐tapping AT screw were not significantly different compared with the 4.5‐mm AO tap. There were no significant differences in maximum screw torque among constructs. Total procedure time was significantly longer for the AT group (5.8 ± 1.6 minutes) compared with the AO group (2.9 ± 1.1 minutes; P= .001). AT stabilized specimens had significantly greater mean ± SD initial shear stiffness (3.64 ± 1.08 kN/mm) than AO specimens (1.64 ± 0.73 kN/mm; P= .005). All other shear mechanical testing variables were not statistically different among screw types. Conclusion— The 4/5 Acutrak insertion technique was accurate and safe, and the AT screw effectively stabilized simulated equine C3 frontal plane slab fractures. When tested in shear, this screw type was mechanically comparable to the 4.5‐mm AO screw; however, AT constructs had greater initial shear stiffness. Initi
ISSN:0161-3499
1532-950X
DOI:10.1053/jvet.2003.50019