The effect of aprotinin on transfusion requirements in pediatric orthotopic liver transplantation
: The use of aprotinin to reduce blood loss by inhibiting fibrinolysis thereby decreasing transfusion requirements during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), is well‐documented in adults. We set out to test the hypothesis that the prophylactic use of aprotinin reduced blood product requirements...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pediatric transplantation 2003-04, Vol.7 (2), p.142-148 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | : The use of aprotinin to reduce blood loss by inhibiting fibrinolysis thereby decreasing transfusion requirements during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), is well‐documented in adults. We set out to test the hypothesis that the prophylactic use of aprotinin reduced blood product requirements during pediatric OLT.
A retrospective study was performed, reviewing data from 24 OLTs performed over a 4‐yr period. Six patients did not receive aprotinin (group 1), while 18 (group 2) received a weight‐based dose of aprotinin. Both groups were comparable with respect to demographics, baseline characteristics and surgical variables except for a significantly more prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) in the aprotinin group (p = 0.015). Despite the fact that median values for transfused volumes of red blood cells (78.3 vs. 36.7 mL/kg) and fresh frozen plasma (51.9 vs. 23.7 mL/kg) were more than halved in the aprotinin group, there was no statistical difference demonstrated. The failure to reach statistical significance can probably be explained by the small number in group 1 and a high level of scatter. All patients in group 1 required intraoperative transfusion of RBC and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) while two patients in group 2 did not require RBC and seven received no FFP. There were four patients in group 1 and 17 in group 2 who did not receive platelets while five in group 1 and 12 in group 2 did not receive cryoprecipitate. The differences between the groups in avoidance of these blood products did not reach statistical significance. There was little difference between groups with respect to albumin and crystalloid requirements. No statistical difference was demonstrated in intraoperative hematologic profiles between the two groups except during the anhepatic phase of surgery when there was a statistically significant more prolonged prothrombin time (p = 0.04) and a greater international normalized ratio (p = 0.027) in group 2. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1397-3142 1399-3046 |
DOI: | 10.1034/j.1399-3046.2003.00037.x |