Safety and efficacy of a novel device for treatment of thrombotic and atherosclerotic lesions in native coronary arteries and saphenous vein grafts: Results from the multicenter X-sizer for treatment of thrombus and atherosclerosis in coronary applications trial (X-TRACT) study

Intervention in thrombotic lesions and diseased saphenous vein grafts frequently results in thromboembolic complications, including no‐reflow, distal branch occlusion, periprocedural MI, and death. The utility of a novel thromboatherectomy device, the X‐Sizer, was tested in 50 consecutive patients a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2003-04, Vol.58 (4), p.419-427
Hauptverfasser: Stone, Gregg W., Cox, David A., Low, Reginald, Cates, Christopher U., Satler, Lowell, Bailey, Steven R., Kuntz, Richard E., Lansky, Alexandra J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Intervention in thrombotic lesions and diseased saphenous vein grafts frequently results in thromboembolic complications, including no‐reflow, distal branch occlusion, periprocedural MI, and death. The utility of a novel thromboatherectomy device, the X‐Sizer, was tested in 50 consecutive patients at nine U.S. centers. A total of 61 lesions were treated in 31 vein grafts and 19 native coronary arteries; thrombus was present in 78% of lesions, and TIMI 0–1 flow in 21%. TIMI 3 flow improved from 57% at baseline to 94% postprocedure. No patient developed visible distal thromboemboli, side‐branch occlusion, or reduced antegrade flow. Thirty‐day events included one death (2.0%), Q‐ or non–Q‐wave MI in 4.0%, TVR in 6.0%, and any MACE in 6.0%. We conclude that the use of the X‐Sizer prior to percutaneous intervention is safe in high‐risk vein grafts and thrombotic lesions and results in a low rate of adverse events compared to historical controls. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2003;58:419–427. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:1522-1946
1522-726X
DOI:10.1002/ccd.10511