Six hundred and ten breech versus 12,405 cephalic deliveries at term: is there any difference in the neonatal outcome?

Objectives: To compare neonatal morbidity of breech and cephalic deliveries at term. Study design: Cohort study of 610 consecutive singleton breech presentations and 12,405 consecutive singleton cephalic presentations in term between 1992–1998. Five hundred and fourteen breech and 11,989 cephalic pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 2003-04, Vol.107 (2), p.140-144
Hauptverfasser: Sibony, Olivier, Luton, Dominique, Oury, Jean-François, Blot, Philippe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives: To compare neonatal morbidity of breech and cephalic deliveries at term. Study design: Cohort study of 610 consecutive singleton breech presentations and 12,405 consecutive singleton cephalic presentations in term between 1992–1998. Five hundred and fourteen breech and 11,989 cephalic presentations were candidates for vaginal delivery, of which 407 (79%) breeches and 11,265 (94%) cephalic delivered vaginally. Results: Neonatal intensive care admissions were significantly greater for breech than cephalic vaginal deliveries (2.7% versus 0.25%, P=0.000), but newborn intensive care admission and mortality were equally distributed between the two groups. Conclusions: A low caesarean rate is possible (21% beech and 6% cephalic). Neonatal morbidity was equal in the two populations. Admission to neonatal intensive care was significantly more frequent for caesarean section than for vaginal delivery in the cephalic group and equal in the breech group. This study justifies our obstetrical policy and the realisation of a trial in several centres similar in terms of perinatal management.
ISSN:0301-2115
1872-7654
DOI:10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00311-1