Subciliary versus Subtarsal Approaches to Orbitozygomatic Fractures

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: Many incisions have been described for approaches to orbitozygomatic fractures, the most frequently used being the subciliary incision with its modifications, the subtarsal incision, and the transconjunctival incision with or without lateral canthotomy. Each of these approaches...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2003-04, Vol.111 (5), p.1708-1713
Hauptverfasser: Rohrich, Rod J, Janis, Jeffrey E, Adams, William P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:LEARNING OBJECTIVES: Many incisions have been described for approaches to orbitozygomatic fractures, the most frequently used being the subciliary incision with its modifications, the subtarsal incision, and the transconjunctival incision with or without lateral canthotomy. Each of these approaches has its advantages and disadvantages that may make it more or less appealing to use depending on the patientʼs age and severity of fracture. A balance must be struck between adequate exposure and acceptable cosmetic result. This article reviews the literature with particular respect to the transcutaneous approaches of subciliary versus subtarsal techniques in the treatment of orbitozygomatic fractures. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1111708, 2003.)
ISSN:0032-1052
1529-4242
DOI:10.1097/01.PRS.0000054209.18400.4E