Phase III Randomized Study of Postradiotherapy Chemotherapy with Combination α-Difluoromethylornithine-PCV versus PCV for Anaplastic Gliomas
Purpose: In the current study, we sought to determine whether the addition of DFMO (α-difluoromethyl ornithine; eflornithine), an inhibitor of ornithine decarboxylase, to a nitrosourea-based therapy procarbazine, 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea, vincristine (PCV) would be more effective...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical cancer research 2003-03, Vol.9 (3), p.981-990 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose: In the current study, we sought to determine whether the addition of DFMO (α-difluoromethyl ornithine; eflornithine), an
inhibitor of ornithine decarboxylase, to a nitrosourea-based therapy procarbazine, 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea,
vincristine (PCV) would be more effective as a postirradiation adjuvant therapy for anaplastic gliomas (AG) than PCV alone.
Patients and Methods: After conventional radiation therapy, 249 AG patients were randomized to receive either DFMO-PCV (125 patients) or PCV alone
(124 patients), with survival being the primary endpoint and progression-free survival being an important secondary endpoint.
The starting dosage of DFMO was 3 grams/m 2 p.o. q. 8 h for 14 days before and 4 weeks after 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea; PCV was administered as described
previously (1)
. Clinical and radiological (gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging) follow-ups were nominally at the end of each
6- or 8-week cycle (PCV at 6 weeks; DFMO-PCV at 8 weeks). Laboratory evaluations for hematological and other adverse effects
were at 2-week intervals.
Results: In the DFMO-PCV arm, there were 114 evaluable patients with 78.1% anaplastic astrocytoma (AA), 3.5% anaplastic oligoastrocytoma
(AOA), 14% anaplastic oligodendroglioma (AO), and 4.4% other malignant gliomas. These histological groupings were comparable
with those of the 114 patients in the PCV arm: ( a ) 69.3% AA; ( b ) 7% AOA; ( c ) 21.1% AO; and ( d ) 2.6% malignant gliomas. Although improved survival estimates for the DFMO-PCV treatment group persisted over the course
of the study, analysis of survival differences over the entire follow-up period did not yield significance ( P = 0.11). However, careful analysis of the corresponding hazard and hazard ratio functions indicated that the real treatment
difference was limited to the first 24 months of follow-up ( P = 0.02). The median progression-free survival for the two treatment groups, as measured from postradiotherapy registration,
was 71.1 months for the DFMO-PCV arm and 37.5 months for the PCV-only arm. Median survival, measured from registration, was
75.8 and 61.1 months, respectively, for the DFMO-PCV and PCV arms. The treatment effect persisted when the AA histology was
separated from AO and AOA histologies. This effect persisted even after adjusting for the covariates of age, Karnofsky performance
status, and extent of surgery. There was a statistically significant increase in grade 3 adverse |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1078-0432 1557-3265 |