Laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: 7 years experience

Background:  Since 1994 we have placed all peritoneal dialysis (Tenckhoff) catheters at our hospital laparoscopically using a technique that incorporates suture fixation into the pelvis. The purpose of this study was to determine the long‐term outcome of this approach. Method:  Perioperative and fol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ANZ journal of surgery 2003-03, Vol.73 (3), p.109-111
Hauptverfasser: Lu, Cu T., Watson, David I., Elias, Tony J., Faull, Randall J., Clarkson, Anthony R., Bannister, Kym M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background:  Since 1994 we have placed all peritoneal dialysis (Tenckhoff) catheters at our hospital laparoscopically using a technique that incorporates suture fixation into the pelvis. The purpose of this study was to determine the long‐term outcome of this approach. Method:  Perioperative and follow‐up data for all patients undergoing placement of a peritoneal dialysis catheter at the Royal Adelaide Hospital were collected prospectively and managed on unit specific and hospital wide computerized databases. A total of 148 procedures were carried out in 123 patients from March 1994 to November 2001. Follow‐up ranged from 3 to 68 months (median, 42 months). All procedures were undertaken or supervised by one surgeon, and catheters were routinely sutured into the pelvis at laparoscopy. Results:  There was no perioperative mortality in this series, and only one catheter could not be placed laparoscopically. This was in a patient with extensive intra‐abdominal adhesions. Mean operative time was 27 min (range, 10−100 min), and mean postoperative stay was 2.8 days (range, 1−12 days). Seven (5%) patients experienced peri/postoperative haemorrhage, and four of these underwent surgical re‐exploration. Twenty‐five (17%) catheters are still used for dialysis. Thirty‐four (23%) catheters were removed when the recipient received a subsequent renal transplant, and 42 (28%) patients died during follow‐up. Forty‐six (31%) patients required catheter revision or removal because of technical problems; 26 (18%) recurrent peritonitis or exit site infection; and 20 (14%) catheter blockage. Twenty‐eight reinsertion procedures were carried out in 25 patients. Ten (7%) patients developed port site hernias at late follow‐up, and required hernioplasty. Catheter migration leading to malfunction (poor drainage) occurred in eight (5%) patients only. Conclusions:  Laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters is a safe and effective procedure. The majority of patients will dialyse successfully using this technique. Suturing the catheter tip into the pelvis is associated with a low rate of catheter migration.
ISSN:1445-1433
1445-2197
DOI:10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02651.x