Laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: 7 years experience
Background: Since 1994 we have placed all peritoneal dialysis (Tenckhoff) catheters at our hospital laparoscopically using a technique that incorporates suture fixation into the pelvis. The purpose of this study was to determine the long‐term outcome of this approach. Method: Perioperative and fol...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | ANZ journal of surgery 2003-03, Vol.73 (3), p.109-111 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Since 1994 we have placed all peritoneal dialysis (Tenckhoff) catheters at our hospital laparoscopically using a technique that incorporates suture fixation into the pelvis. The purpose of this study was to determine the long‐term outcome of this approach.
Method: Perioperative and follow‐up data for all patients undergoing placement of a peritoneal dialysis catheter at the Royal Adelaide Hospital were collected prospectively and managed on unit specific and hospital wide computerized databases. A total of 148 procedures were carried out in 123 patients from March 1994 to November 2001. Follow‐up ranged from 3 to 68 months (median, 42 months). All procedures were undertaken or supervised by one surgeon, and catheters were routinely sutured into the pelvis at laparoscopy.
Results: There was no perioperative mortality in this series, and only one catheter could not be placed laparoscopically. This was in a patient with extensive intra‐abdominal adhesions. Mean operative time was 27 min (range, 10−100 min), and mean postoperative stay was 2.8 days (range, 1−12 days). Seven (5%) patients experienced peri/postoperative haemorrhage, and four of these underwent surgical re‐exploration. Twenty‐five (17%) catheters are still used for dialysis. Thirty‐four (23%) catheters were removed when the recipient received a subsequent renal transplant, and 42 (28%) patients died during follow‐up. Forty‐six (31%) patients required catheter revision or removal because of technical problems; 26 (18%) recurrent peritonitis or exit site infection; and 20 (14%) catheter blockage. Twenty‐eight reinsertion procedures were carried out in 25 patients. Ten (7%) patients developed port site hernias at late follow‐up, and required hernioplasty. Catheter migration leading to malfunction (poor drainage) occurred in eight (5%) patients only.
Conclusions: Laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters is a safe and effective procedure. The majority of patients will dialyse successfully using this technique. Suturing the catheter tip into the pelvis is associated with a low rate of catheter migration. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1445-1433 1445-2197 |
DOI: | 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02651.x |