The Value of a Second Transurethral Resection in Evaluating Patients with Bladder Tumours

Objectives: To evaluate the usefulness of a second transurethral resection for superficial and muscle-invasive bladder tumours. Methods: A review of the literature relevant to repeat resection for bladder tumours was conducted using Medline Services. Results: Transurethral resection of the bladder h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European urology 2003-03, Vol.43 (3), p.241-245
Hauptverfasser: Miladi, Makram, Peyromaure, Michaël, Zerbib, Marc, Saı̈ghi, Djillali, Debré, Bernard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives: To evaluate the usefulness of a second transurethral resection for superficial and muscle-invasive bladder tumours. Methods: A review of the literature relevant to repeat resection for bladder tumours was conducted using Medline Services. Results: Transurethral resection of the bladder has two shortcomings: underestimating clinical stage, and overlooking other lesions. A second transurethral resection, when performed 2–6 weeks after the initial resection, corrects clinical staging errors in 9–49% of cases and detects residual tumour in 26–83% of cases. A second resection is particularly warranted for T1 tumours since 2–28% of them prove to be muscle-invasive, thus requiring a change in management. For muscle-invasive tumours, a second resection may be performed only if bladder sparing is being considered, as it helps to exclude the presence of tumour sites contra-indicating conservative treatment. Conclusions: A second transurethral bladder resection may be warranted for T1 tumours, and for invasive tumours when a bladder preservation is planned.
ISSN:0302-2838
1873-7560
DOI:10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00040-X