The Value of a Second Transurethral Resection in Evaluating Patients with Bladder Tumours
Objectives: To evaluate the usefulness of a second transurethral resection for superficial and muscle-invasive bladder tumours. Methods: A review of the literature relevant to repeat resection for bladder tumours was conducted using Medline Services. Results: Transurethral resection of the bladder h...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European urology 2003-03, Vol.43 (3), p.241-245 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives:
To evaluate the usefulness of a second transurethral resection for superficial and muscle-invasive bladder tumours.
Methods:
A review of the literature relevant to repeat resection for bladder tumours was conducted using Medline Services.
Results:
Transurethral resection of the bladder has two shortcomings: underestimating clinical stage, and overlooking other lesions. A second transurethral resection, when performed 2–6 weeks after the initial resection, corrects clinical staging errors in 9–49% of cases and detects residual tumour in 26–83% of cases. A second resection is particularly warranted for T1 tumours since 2–28% of them prove to be muscle-invasive, thus requiring a change in management. For muscle-invasive tumours, a second resection may be performed only if bladder sparing is being considered, as it helps to exclude the presence of tumour sites contra-indicating conservative treatment.
Conclusions:
A second transurethral bladder resection may be warranted for T1 tumours, and for invasive tumours when a bladder preservation is planned. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0302-2838 1873-7560 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00040-X |