Risk factors for local recurrence of small hepatocellular carcinoma tumors after a single session, single application of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation

BACKGROUND The objectives of this study were to clarify risk factors for local tumor recurrence and to determine which patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are most suitable for a single session, single application of percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation. METHODS Fifty‐six consecutive p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2003-03, Vol.97 (5), p.1253-1262
Hauptverfasser: Komorizono, Yasuji, Oketani, Makoto, Sako, Katsumi, Yamasaki, Naruhiro, Shibatou, Toshihiko, Maeda, Masahiko, Kohara, Kazunori, Shigenobu, Shuhou, Ishibashi, Kazuaki, Arima, Terukatsu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND The objectives of this study were to clarify risk factors for local tumor recurrence and to determine which patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are most suitable for a single session, single application of percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation. METHODS Fifty‐six consecutive patients with 65 HCC tumors measuring ≤ 3 cm in greatest dimension who received a single session, single application of percutaneous RF ablation and who achieved optimal tumor ablation, as assessed by an immediate computed tomography scan, were enrolled in this study. Six possible factors for local recurrence were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model: tumor size, tumor location, proximity of the tumor to intrahepatic large vessels, types of electrodes used, prior treatment, and observation of impedance rises. Local recurrence free intervals were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences between groups were compared using the log‐rank test. RESULTS The Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall cumulative local recurrence free intervals after a single RF ablation treatment were 76% (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 70.9–81.7%) at 12 months and 74% (95%CI, 68.2–79.6%) at 15 months. The log‐rank test revealed a statistically significant difference between the local recurrence free intervals according to tumor size (P = 0.001) and tumor location (P < 0.001). Further investigation with a Cox regression analysis indicated that a greatest tumor dimension > 2 cm (risk ratio [RR], 4.9; 95%CI, 1.3–16.4; P = 0.019) and subcapsular location (RR, 5.2; 95%CI, 1.7–16.6; P = 0.005) were associated independently with local recurrence. The other four factors were not associated with local recurrence in this study. CONCLUSIONS A single session, single application of RF ablation produced favorable local control. Patients who have nonsubcapsular HCC tumors measuring ≤ 2 cm in greatest dimension may be the most suitable candidates for a single‐session, single application of RF ablation. Cancer 2003;97:1253–62. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11168 For the treatment of patients with small hepatocellular carcinomas who have tumors that measure ≤ 3 cm in greatest dimension, a single session, single application of radiofrequency ablation can result in favorable local control, depending on multiple factors. In this study, tumor size and tumor location were associated significantly with the local recurrence free interval.
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/cncr.11168