Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: Are there useful and valid predictors of success or failure?
Objective: Before parturition are there useful and valid predictors of successful or unsuccessful vaginal birth after previous cesarean birth that could be used to enhance the obstetric care of a patient and her pregnancy? Study Design: The clinical course and outcome of all patients who attempted v...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1992-06, Vol.166 (6), p.1811-1819 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: Before parturition are there useful and valid predictors of successful or unsuccessful vaginal birth after previous cesarean birth that could be used to enhance the obstetric care of a patient and her pregnancy?
Study Design: The clinical course and outcome of all patients who attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery at one level III center during 1989 were evaluated to identify factors prognostic of a successful or unsuccessful patient group; use of this information in stepwise logistic regression and cluster analysis was disappointing.
Results: No single criterion or optimal clusters of factors were found and no equation achieved >75% predictability of outcome with acceptable sensitivity and specificity.
Conclusions: Before parturition prediction of outcome of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery is tenuous regardless of past obstetric history or recent clinical parameters. Thus it seems appropriate to encourage a trial of labor in almost all patients with a prior low-segment uterine incision (transverse or vertical) unless there is a strong physician or patient-derived contraindication to such an undertaking. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9378 1097-6868 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91572-R |