Comparison of the disinfectant efficacy of Perasafe® and 2% glutaraldehyde in in vitro tests
Two percent glutaraldehyde has been the reference disinfectant for high-level disinfection, but its frequent association with adverse effects has stimulated a search for newer disinfectants. We compared the efficacy of 2% glutaraldehyde with that of a new disinfectant formulation, Perasafe® (0.2% pe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of hospital infection 2003-02, Vol.53 (2), p.124-128 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Two percent glutaraldehyde has been the reference disinfectant for high-level disinfection, but its frequent association with adverse effects has stimulated a search for newer disinfectants. We compared the efficacy of 2% glutaraldehyde with that of a new disinfectant formulation, Perasafe® (0.2% peracetic acid) in six in vitro tests: germicidal effect in a suspension of micro-organisms; using a microbe-contaminated metallic endodoncy file; an endoscope model; a modified capacity test; a sporicidal test, and corrosiveness on metallic instruments. Both products were effective germicides in 10–20min, completely destroying microbial inocula except for Mycobacterium and spores. Internal irrigation of endoscopes with 100mL of either was totally effective. Both substances resisted inactivation after repeated inoculation and did not corrode clean instruments; however, when organic matter was added the 0.2% peracetic acid formulation cleaned without corrosion, while 2% glutaraldehyde fixed the matter to the scalpel, causing corrosion within 2h. In summary, Perasafe® is a good substitute for 2% glutaraldehyde for high-level disinfection. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0195-6701 1532-2939 |
DOI: | 10.1053/jhin.2002.1296 |