Comparison of the disinfectant efficacy of Perasafe® and 2% glutaraldehyde in in vitro tests

Two percent glutaraldehyde has been the reference disinfectant for high-level disinfection, but its frequent association with adverse effects has stimulated a search for newer disinfectants. We compared the efficacy of 2% glutaraldehyde with that of a new disinfectant formulation, Perasafe® (0.2% pe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of hospital infection 2003-02, Vol.53 (2), p.124-128
Hauptverfasser: Vizcaino-Alcaide, M.J, Herruzo-Cabrera, R, Fernandez-Aceñero, M.J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Two percent glutaraldehyde has been the reference disinfectant for high-level disinfection, but its frequent association with adverse effects has stimulated a search for newer disinfectants. We compared the efficacy of 2% glutaraldehyde with that of a new disinfectant formulation, Perasafe® (0.2% peracetic acid) in six in vitro tests: germicidal effect in a suspension of micro-organisms; using a microbe-contaminated metallic endodoncy file; an endoscope model; a modified capacity test; a sporicidal test, and corrosiveness on metallic instruments. Both products were effective germicides in 10–20min, completely destroying microbial inocula except for Mycobacterium and spores. Internal irrigation of endoscopes with 100mL of either was totally effective. Both substances resisted inactivation after repeated inoculation and did not corrode clean instruments; however, when organic matter was added the 0.2% peracetic acid formulation cleaned without corrosion, while 2% glutaraldehyde fixed the matter to the scalpel, causing corrosion within 2h. In summary, Perasafe® is a good substitute for 2% glutaraldehyde for high-level disinfection.
ISSN:0195-6701
1532-2939
DOI:10.1053/jhin.2002.1296