Evaluation of a new pediatric air-displacement plethysmograph for body-composition assessment by means of chemical analysis of bovine tissue phantoms

Body-composition assessment reflects infant growth and nutritional status but is limited by practical considerations, accuracy, and safety. This study evaluated the precision and accuracy of a new air-displacement plethysmography (ADP) system for pediatric body-composition assessment. We used 24 pha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of clinical nutrition 2003-02, Vol.77 (2), p.364-370
Hauptverfasser: SAINZ, Roberto D, URLANDO, Alessandro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Body-composition assessment reflects infant growth and nutritional status but is limited by practical considerations, accuracy, and safety. This study evaluated the precision and accuracy of a new air-displacement plethysmography (ADP) system for pediatric body-composition assessment. We used 24 phantoms constructed from bovine lean muscle and fat. The phantoms varied in mass (1.3894-9.9516 kg) and percentage fat (%Fat; 2.08-34.40%), thereby representing infants between birth and 6 mo of age. Estimates of %Fat obtained with chemical analysis (CA), hydrostatic weighing, and ADP were compared. There was no significant difference between %Fat measured with ADP (%Fat(ADP)) and %Fat measured with CA (%Fat(CA)); the mean values were 18.55% and 18.59%, respectively. SDs for %Fat(ADP) and %Fat(CA) were not significantly different (0.70% and 0.73%, respectively). %Fat measurements obtained with ADP, CA, and hydrostatic weighing were highly correlated (r > 0.99, P < 0.0001). The regression equation (%Fat(CA) = 0.996%Fat(ADP) + 0.119; SEE = 0.600; adjusted R(2) = 0.997; P < 0.0001) did not differ significantly from the line of identity (%Fat(CA) = %Fat(ADP)). There was high agreement between individual measurements of %Fat(ADP) and %Fat(CA), as shown by the narrow 95% limits of agreements between methods (-1.22% to 1.13%), and there was no systematic bias in individual differences across the phantom mass and %Fat ranges. ADP provides a highly precise and accurate estimate of %Fat in bovine tissue phantoms in the pediatric ranges of body weight and body fatness.
ISSN:0002-9165
1938-3207
DOI:10.1093/ajcn/77.2.364