Intravenous levosimendan treatment is cost-effective compared with dobutamine in severe low-output heart failure: an analysis based on the international LIDO trial
Background: Levosimendan, a novel calcium sensitiser, improves cardiac performance and symptoms without increasing oxygen consumption, and decreases the mortality of patients with low‐output heart failure. Aims: To estimate the cost‐effectiveness of intravenous treatment with levosimendan compared w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of heart failure 2003-01, Vol.5 (1), p.101-108 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background:
Levosimendan, a novel calcium sensitiser, improves cardiac performance and symptoms without increasing oxygen consumption, and decreases the mortality of patients with low‐output heart failure.
Aims:
To estimate the cost‐effectiveness of intravenous treatment with levosimendan compared with dobutamine in patients with severe low‐output heart failure.
Methods:
This economic evaluation was based on a European clinical trial (LIDO), in which 203 patients with severe heart failure randomly received a 24 h infusion with either levosimendan or dobutamine. Survival and resource utilisation data were collected for 6 months; survival was extrapolated assuming a mean additional lifetime of 3 years based on data from the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study trial. Costs were based on study drug usage and hospitalisation in the 6‐month follow‐up. A sensitivity analysis on dosage of drug and duration of survival was performed.
Results:
The mean survival over 6 months was 157±52 days in the levosimendan group and 139±64 days in the dobutamine group (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1388-9842 1879-0844 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S1388-9842(02)00246-5 |