Metastatic ovarian or colonic cancer: A clinical challenge
Clinical problems arise when histology is unable to differentiate between an ovarian carcinoma infiltrating into the rectosigmoid region and a colonic cancer with ovarian metastases. To evaluate the discriminative value of immunohistochemistry we studied four groups: (A) ovarian carcinoma ( n = 21),...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of cancer (1990) 1992, Vol.28 (2), p.394-399 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Clinical problems arise when histology is unable to differentiate between an ovarian carcinoma infiltrating into the rectosigmoid region and a colonic cancer with ovarian metastases. To evaluate the discriminative value of immunohistochemistry we studied four groups: (A) ovarian carcinoma (
n = 21), (B) ovarian carcinoma with sigmoid stenosis (
n = 18), (C) colonic carcinoma (
n = 20) and (D) a group in which the differential diagnosis was a problem (
n = 19). Paraffin sections stained with a panel of monoclonal antibodies revealed specific patterns: in group A and B a negative Parlam-4 and positive OC-125; in group C the opposite; in group D the ‘colonic’ pattern in 15 cases, and the ‘ovarian’ pattern in only 2. The clinical diagnosis in group D during follow-up was ovarian carcinoma in 7, colonic carcinoma in 8, double tumour in 1 and still unknown in 3. This was based on high levels of serum tumour markers such as carcinoembryonic antigen (
n = 5) and CA-125 (
n = 4), laparotomy (
n = 4), autopsy (
n = 1), barium enema and/or endoscopy (
n = 5). The response to chemotherapy in group D was extremely poor. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0959-8049 1879-0852 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0959-8049(05)80061-9 |