U.S. Predoctoral Education in Pediatric Dentistry: Its Impact on Access to Dental Care

This study sought to identify faculty, organization, patient pool, and procedures taught in predoctoral pediatric dentistry programs using a questionnaire sent to all fifty‐five U.S. dental schools in 2001. Forty‐eight (87 percent) programs reported an average of 3.9 full‐time and 2.1 part‐time FTE...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dental education 2003-01, Vol.67 (1), p.23-30
Hauptverfasser: Seale, N. Sue, Casamassimo, Paul S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study sought to identify faculty, organization, patient pool, and procedures taught in predoctoral pediatric dentistry programs using a questionnaire sent to all fifty‐five U.S. dental schools in 2001. Forty‐eight (87 percent) programs reported an average of 3.9 full‐time and 2.1 part‐time FTE faculty, resulting in a mean faculty to student ratio of 1:6.4. One‐third employ general dentists to teach pediatric dentistry, and 36 percent report fewer faculty than five years ago. Two‐thirds were stand‐alone departments. Over half (55 percent) reported increases in patient pools, but also a lack of patients with restorative needs. Half of the programs supplemented school‐based pools with special populations, and two‐thirds sent students on external rotations, most often to treat high‐caries children. Those not using external rotations cited lack of faculty. Accepted patients averaged about four years, with only 6 percent of the pool under three years. Low‐income or Medicaid‐covered children accounted for 88 percent of school patient pools. Half of the schools felt the pool inadequate to meet competencies, attributable to lack of patients' restorative needs or inadequate intake numbers. Fewer than half of the programs (48 percent) provided hands‐on experience with disabled patients, and one‐third afforded every student with this experience. Pediatric dentistry was mentioned in fewer than half of the competency documents. Results suggest that U.S. pediatric dentistry predoctoral programs have faculty and patient pool limitations that affect competency achievement and adversely affect training and practice.
ISSN:0022-0337
1930-7837
DOI:10.1002/j.0022-0337.2003.67.1.tb03615.x