Classification of essential tremor

Classification of essential tremor was attempted using tremor frequency; tremor duration; family history of tremor; responsiveness to alcohol, propranolol, and primidone; muscle contraction pattern; and long-latency reflexes. Sixty-one patients were evaluated. The majority of patients had a tremor f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical neuropharmacology 1992-04, Vol.15 (2), p.81-87
Hauptverfasser: KOLLER, W. C, BUSENBARK, K, GRAY, C, HASSANEIN, R. S, DUBINSKY, R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Classification of essential tremor was attempted using tremor frequency; tremor duration; family history of tremor; responsiveness to alcohol, propranolol, and primidone; muscle contraction pattern; and long-latency reflexes. Sixty-one patients were evaluated. The majority of patients had a tremor frequency less than 7.0 Hz, a positive family history, and a positive response to alcohol. Approximately 46% of patients had a beneficial response with propranolol and 71% with primidone. Tremor frequency was inversely correlated with age and directly correlated with an antagonist pattern of muscle contraction. Enhanced long-latency reflexes were not found. Other characteristics of essential tremor were not significantly correlated. It is concluded that essential tremor can not be classified into subtypes.
ISSN:0362-5664
1537-162X
DOI:10.1097/00002826-199204000-00001