Classification of essential tremor
Classification of essential tremor was attempted using tremor frequency; tremor duration; family history of tremor; responsiveness to alcohol, propranolol, and primidone; muscle contraction pattern; and long-latency reflexes. Sixty-one patients were evaluated. The majority of patients had a tremor f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical neuropharmacology 1992-04, Vol.15 (2), p.81-87 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Classification of essential tremor was attempted using tremor frequency; tremor duration; family history of tremor; responsiveness to alcohol, propranolol, and primidone; muscle contraction pattern; and long-latency reflexes. Sixty-one patients were evaluated. The majority of patients had a tremor frequency less than 7.0 Hz, a positive family history, and a positive response to alcohol. Approximately 46% of patients had a beneficial response with propranolol and 71% with primidone. Tremor frequency was inversely correlated with age and directly correlated with an antagonist pattern of muscle contraction. Enhanced long-latency reflexes were not found. Other characteristics of essential tremor were not significantly correlated. It is concluded that essential tremor can not be classified into subtypes. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0362-5664 1537-162X |
DOI: | 10.1097/00002826-199204000-00001 |