Single-Operator Comparison of Early and Mid-Second-Trimester Amniocentesis

We sought to determine whether early amniocentesis is a safe and acceptable method of genetic evaluation in early pregnancy. During the 54-month period from September 1986 to February 1991, 300 consecutive early second-trimester amniocenteses were performed transabdominally at 13–14 weeksʼ gestation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) 1992-06, Vol.79 (6), p.940-944
Hauptverfasser: ASSEL, BARBARA G, LEWIS, SUSAN M, DICKERMAN, LOIS H, PARK, VICKI MURTIF, JASSANI, MAJIDA N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We sought to determine whether early amniocentesis is a safe and acceptable method of genetic evaluation in early pregnancy. During the 54-month period from September 1986 to February 1991, 300 consecutive early second-trimester amniocenteses were performed transabdominally at 13–14 weeksʼ gestation and 567 consecutive mid-second-trimester transabdominal amniocenteses were performed at 16–18 weeks. Group assignment was nonrandomized, inter-operator-dependent variables were eliminated, and analysis was performed in one cytogenetics laboratory. The median maternal age and indications for the procedure were similar in both groups. There were no significant differences between the early-and mid-second-trimester amniocenteses in failed sampling, ambiguous results, pregnancy loss from 4 weeks after the procedure to 28 weeksʼ gestation, preterm birth, or perinatal death rate. Pregnancy loss within 4 weeks of amniocentesis was more frequent in early-than in mid-second-trimester amniocenteses. We conclude that early amniocentesis is a safe and acceptable method of genetic evaluation.
ISSN:0029-7844
1873-233X