Anesthesia in repeat mediastinoscopy: A retrospective study of 101 patients

In most medical textbooks, a mediastinoscopy is considered an absolute contraindication for a repeat mediastinoscopy. Retrospectively, perioperative data from 101 patients were evaluated in whom repeat mediastinoscopy was performed. The complication rate was 23% in 18 patients; 10% of these were dir...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia 1992-04, Vol.6 (2), p.193-195
Hauptverfasser: Vueghs, Peter J.M., Schurink, Gerard A., Vaes, Leo, Langemeyer, Johanna J.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In most medical textbooks, a mediastinoscopy is considered an absolute contraindication for a repeat mediastinoscopy. Retrospectively, perioperative data from 101 patients were evaluated in whom repeat mediastinoscopy was performed. The complication rate was 23% in 18 patients; 10% of these were directly related to the surgery. The surgical complications observed were hemorrhage, biopsy of the esophagus, paresis of a recurrent laryngeal nerve, and pneumothorax, which were all treated successfully. The patients receiving a nondepolarizing relaxant had fewer complications than patients given only a single dose of succinylcholine. In this patient population, the mortality rate was zero. This review concludes that an earlier mediastinoscopy is not necessarily an absolute contraindication for repeat mediastinoscopy.
ISSN:1053-0770
1532-8422
DOI:10.1016/1053-0770(92)90197-F