Glucose degradation products in PD fluids: Do they disappear from the peritoneal cavity and enter the systemic circulation?
Glucose degradation products in PD fluids: Do they disappear from the peritoneal cavity and enter the systemic circulation? Glucose degradation products (GDP) are generated in peritoneal dialysis (PD) fluid during heat sterilization and storage. They are thought to adversely affect the peritoneal me...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Kidney international 2003-01, Vol.63 (1), p.298-305 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Glucose degradation products in PD fluids: Do they disappear from the peritoneal cavity and enter the systemic circulation?
Glucose degradation products (GDP) are generated in peritoneal dialysis (PD) fluid during heat sterilization and storage. They are thought to adversely affect the peritoneal membrane. The fate of GDP within the peritoneal cavity has not been well characterized.
A clinical study was designed to determine (1) whether during the dwell in the peritoneal cavity GDP concentration decreases in the PD fluid as assessed by ex vivo formation of AGE; (2) whether exposure to GDP-containing PD fluids increases plasma fluorescence (as an index of plasma AGE concentration) as well as plasma carboxymethyllysine (CML) concentration; and (3) whether exposure to GDP-containing PD fluids adversely affects glycoprotein CA 125 concentration. A two-group crossover design was adopted comprising two consecutive observation periods of eight weeks each. Stable PD patients were exposed in random order either to conventional PD fluid (heat sterilized at pH 5.5) and subsequently to PD test fluid (or the 2 fluids in reverse order). The PD test fluid was sterilized using a multicompartment bag system separating highly concentrated glucose at pH 3 from the buffer solution. Conventional and test fluids differed with respect to concentrations of GDP, that is, 3-deoxyglucosone (118 vs. 12.3 μmol/L), methylglyoxal (5.3 μmol/L vs. below detection threshold), 3, 4-dideoxyglucosone-3-ene (10 μmol/L vs. below detection threshold) and acetaldehyde (226 vs. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0085-2538 1523-1755 |
DOI: | 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00705.x |