Endothelin and structurally related analogs distinguish between endothelin receptor subtypes

The endothelin (ET) analog ET-1[1,3,11,15-Ala] was compared with ET-1, ET-2, ET-3 and sarafotoxins (SRTX) S6b and S6c for receptor binding and function. All the peptides exhibited high affinity binding and contracted rabbit pulmonary artery with near equal potency. In rat aorta both ET-3 and ET-1 [1...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biochemical and biophysical research communications 1992-03, Vol.183 (2), p.566-571
Hauptverfasser: Panek, Robert L., Major, Terry C., Hingorani, Gary P., Doherty, Annette M., Taylor, David G., Rapundalo, Stephen T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The endothelin (ET) analog ET-1[1,3,11,15-Ala] was compared with ET-1, ET-2, ET-3 and sarafotoxins (SRTX) S6b and S6c for receptor binding and function. All the peptides exhibited high affinity binding and contracted rabbit pulmonary artery with near equal potency. In rat aorta both ET-3 and ET-1 [1,3,11,15-Ala] bound with much lower affinity than ET-1 while ET-3 displayed weak contractile potency and ET-1[1,3,11,15-Ala] and SRTX-c were inactive. In rat left atria, ET-1[1,3,11,15-Ala] and SRTX-c were weak inhibitors of binding and were also functionally inactive, whereas ET-1, ET-2, ET-3, and SRTX-b were equipotent in producing contractile responses. The data support the idea of there being a predominance of ET A receptors in rat aorta and ET B receptors in rabbit pulmonary artery. In rat left atria, the ET receptor could not be readily classified into ET A or ET B and suggests the existence of a new receptor subtype.
ISSN:0006-291X
1090-2104
DOI:10.1016/0006-291X(92)90519-Q