Cation Concentrations in Fluid from the Oviduct Ampulla and Isthmus of Cows During the Estrous Cycle

To detect variations in oviduct fluid cation concentrations, Ca++ Mg++, K+, and Na+ were determined for daily samples of blood serum and bovine oviduct fluid collected from indwelling isthmic and ampullary catheters. Isthmic oviduct fluid Ca++ concentration was significantly greater than that in amp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dairy science 1992-01, Vol.75 (1), p.58-65
Hauptverfasser: Grippo, Anne A., Henault, Margaret A., Anderson, Sharon H., Killian, Gary J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To detect variations in oviduct fluid cation concentrations, Ca++ Mg++, K+, and Na+ were determined for daily samples of blood serum and bovine oviduct fluid collected from indwelling isthmic and ampullary catheters. Isthmic oviduct fluid Ca++ concentration was significantly greater than that in ampullary fluid, particularly around estrus and ovulation. Maximum Ca+ concentrations found in isthmic oviduct fluid at estrus (2.57±.22mM) and at ovulation (2.50±.29mM) were similar to those of medium used for in vitro capacitation of bovine sperm. Concentrations of Mg++ in oviduct fluid differed significantly by estrous cycle stage, but not by oviduct region, and were consistently lower than those detected in serum. No relationships were found for K+ or Na+ with respect to region or stage, but K+ was generally higher in oviduct fluid than in serum. The concentration of K+ averaged over stage and region (4.46±.13mM) and the K+:Na+ ratio (.032±.002) were similar to those reported in bovine in vitro capacitating and fertilizing media. Concentrations of Ca++ and Na+ from peritoneal fluid from nonstaged cows were similar to those of oviduct fluid or serum. The Mg++ concentration was greater, and K+ concentration was less, in peritoneal than in oviduct fluid.
ISSN:0022-0302
1525-3198
DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77738-8