The effect of graded spinal cord injury on the extrapyramidal and pyramidal motor evoked potentials of the rat

This study investigated the differential effects of graded spinal cord injury on the rat extrapyramidal motor evoked potential (exp-MEP) and pyramidal motor evoked potential (pyr-MEP) and the prognostic value of these effects in predicting postinjury motor performance in the rat model. In 20 rats su...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurosurgery 1992, Vol.30 (1), p.76-84
Hauptverfasser: SHIAU, J. S, ZAPPULLA, R. A, NIEVES, J, BENZEL, E. C, FRIEDMAN, W. A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study investigated the differential effects of graded spinal cord injury on the rat extrapyramidal motor evoked potential (exp-MEP) and pyramidal motor evoked potential (pyr-MEP) and the prognostic value of these effects in predicting postinjury motor performance in the rat model. In 20 rats subjected to graded spinal injury (10-100 g-cm), there was a differential injury threshold for ablation of exp-MEP and pyr-MEP. All peaks of the pyr-MEP were extinguished in the animals subjected to impact forces of 50 g-cm and above (n = 12). In contrast, the exp-MEP was completely abolished in only two animals at injuries of 80 g-cm or above. A residual exp-MEP response persisted in the remaining 18 animals. Motor performance was monitored in 16 additional animals for up to 1 week after spinal injury. The pyr-MEP was abolished in 100% of the rats subjected to a 50-g cm injury (n = 7), whereas the exp-MEP persisted up to the highest impact forces (80 g-cm). Hind leg paralysis was present in the five rats where the pyr-MEP was extinguished but with persistence of the exp-MEP. An 80% reduction in the amplitude of the pyr-MEP in four animals resulted in mild ataxia with motor improvement at the end of a week. An increase or a 70% loss in pyr-MEP peak amplitude resulted in no clinical motor deficits (n = 5).
ISSN:0148-396X
1524-4040
DOI:10.1097/00006123-199201000-00014