Postnatal Transmission of HIV Infection
To the Editor: In the article of Van de Perre et al. (Aug. 29 issue) 1 there are some important definitions concerning the transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) that are not proved. The authors assume that a negative result on polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) analysis is a demonstrat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 1992-02, Vol.326 (9), p.642-644 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To the Editor:
In the article of Van de Perre et al. (Aug. 29 issue)
1
there are some important definitions concerning the transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) that are not proved. The authors assume that a negative result on polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) analysis is a demonstration that there is no infection at that time. We think that a negative result can never be a proof, even with such techniques as the nested PCR. Seroconversion three months after delivery does not prove that infection occurred postnatally. Although seronegative,
2
the mothers were most probably infected before delivery, but no virologic or . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJM199202273260914 |