Comparative binding and degradation of lipoprotein(a) and low density lipoprotein by human monocyte-derived macrophages
The binding and degradation of equimolar concentrations of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and low density lipoprotein (LDL) isolated from the same individual were studied in primary cultures of human monocyte-derived macrophages (HMDM). At 4 degrees C, LDL receptor-mediated binding of both Lp(a) and LDL was...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of biological chemistry 1992-01, Vol.267 (1), p.339-346 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The binding and degradation of equimolar concentrations of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and low density lipoprotein (LDL) isolated from the same individual were studied in primary cultures of human monocyte-derived macrophages (HMDM). At 4 degrees C, LDL receptor-mediated binding of both Lp(a) and LDL was of low affinity, being 0.8 and 0.23 microM, respectively. Competitive binding studies indicated that the binding of Lp(a) to HMDM was competed 63% by excess LDL. In contrast to the 4 degrees C binding data, the degradation of Lp(a) at 37 degrees C was mainly nonspecific because the amount of Lp(a) processed by the LDL receptor pathway in 5 h was 17% that of LDL. According to pulse-chase experiments, this phenomenon may be accounted for by the facts that less Lp(a) is bound to HMDM at 37 degrees C and that Lp(a) has a lower intrinsic degradation rate and was not due to increased intracellular accumulation or retroendocytosis of the lipoprotein. Degradation of both lipoproteins was primarily lysosomal and only modestly affected by up- or down-regulation of the LDL receptor. The rate of retroendocytosis in HMDM was approximately equal to the degradation rate and appeared to be independent of the type of lipoprotein used, up- or down-regulation of the LDL receptor, or the presence of the lysosomotropic agent chloroquine. Overall, the results indicate that HMDM degrade Lp(a) mainly via a nonspecific pathway with only 25% of total Lp(a) degradation occurring through the LDL receptor pathway. As both 37 degrees C degradation and 4 degrees C binding of LDL are mainly LDL receptor specific, the different metabolic behavior observed at 37 degrees C suggests that Lp(a) undergoes temperature-induced conformational changes on cooling to 4 degrees C that allows better recognition of Lp(a) by the LDL receptor at a temperature lower than the physiological temperature of 37 degrees C. How apo(a) affects these structural changes remains to be established. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-9258 1083-351X |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)48499-2 |