COMPARISON OF INCREMENTAL SPINAL ANAESTHESIA USING A 32-GAUGE CATHETER WITH EXTRADURAL ANAESTHESIA FOR ELECTIVE CAESAREAN SECTION

Forty-three mothers who had requested regional anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section were allocated randomly to receive either extradural anaesthesia with pH-adjusted 2% lignocaine with 1/200 000 adrenaline, or incremental spinal anaesthesia using a 32-gauge catheter with 0.5% plain bupivacaine...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of anaesthesia : BJA 1991-02, Vol.66 (2), p.232-236
Hauptverfasser: KESTIN, I.G., MADDEN, A.P., MULVEIN, J.T., GOODMAN, N.W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Forty-three mothers who had requested regional anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section were allocated randomly to receive either extradural anaesthesia with pH-adjusted 2% lignocaine with 1/200 000 adrenaline, or incremental spinal anaesthesia using a 32-gauge catheter with 0.5% plain bupivacaine. Increments of lignocaine or bupivacaine were given with the aim of achieving a block from T4 to S5. The spinal catheter was quicker to place (median 3 min, range 1–45 min, compared with median 10 min, range 1.5–50 min) and spinal anaesthesia was quicker to establish (median 20 min, range 10–46 min compared with median 48 min, range 15–59 min) compared with the extradural technique. The maximum height of the spinal block was significantly higher (median T3–4, range T5–T3) than the extradural group (median T5, range T6–T3). The total dose of intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine was unpredictable, with a mean dose of 2.7 ml and a range between 1.5 ml and 7.4 ml. Haemodynamic stability and the quality of the block were similar between the groups. There were two mild spinal headaches in the spinal group. All the spinal catheters were removed intact.
ISSN:0007-0912
1471-6771
DOI:10.1093/bja/66.2.232