A comparison of three radionuclide myocardial perfusion tracers in clinical practice: The ROBUST study
There are no large studies available to guide the selection of thallium (Tl), methoxyisobutylisonitrile (MIBI) or tetrofosmin (Tf) for myocardial perfusion imaging. Our objective was to compare the technical and clinical performance of the three in routine clinical practice. We randomised 2,560 pati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2002-12, Vol.29 (12), p.1608-1616 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | There are no large studies available to guide the selection of thallium (Tl), methoxyisobutylisonitrile (MIBI) or tetrofosmin (Tf) for myocardial perfusion imaging. Our objective was to compare the technical and clinical performance of the three in routine clinical practice. We randomised 2,560 patients to receive Tl, MIBI or Tf. A 1-day stress/rest protocol was used for MIBI and Tf. Tracer uptake was scored using a 17-segment model, quality and artefact scores were assigned, and ratios of heart (H), liver (L), subdiaphragmatic (S) and lung activity were measured. Mean quality scores (stress/rest) were Tl 2.13/2.16, MIBI 2.18/2.39, Tf 2.18/2.42 ( P=ns stress and MIBI=Tf ( PMIBI>Tf ( PMIBI=Tf, for H/L Tl>MIBI=Tf, and for H/lung Tl |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1619-7070 1619-7089 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00259-002-0998-8 |