Limiting Access and Patient Selection in Liver Transplantation

To the Editor: Under new Health Care Financing Administration rules, liver-transplantation programs must show a 77 percent rate of survival at one year among their patients to be accredited to receive Medicare funds. We believe this may place physicians in the ethically compromising position of havi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 1992-02, Vol.326 (6), p.413-413
Hauptverfasser: Burck, R, Sheldon, M, Burton, L A, Williams, J, Foster, P, Bone, R, Jensen, D, Sankary, H, Rosenblate, H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To the Editor: Under new Health Care Financing Administration rules, liver-transplantation programs must show a 77 percent rate of survival at one year among their patients to be accredited to receive Medicare funds. We believe this may place physicians in the ethically compromising position of having to choose between program accreditation and patient treatment. This leads us to three observations. First, the social contract of American medicine presupposes that the doctor is the patient's advocate, not an advocate for society against patients whose care is costly or patients whose condition is such that the doctor cannot be sure that procedures . . .
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJM199202063260613