Limiting Access and Patient Selection in Liver Transplantation
To the Editor: Under new Health Care Financing Administration rules, liver-transplantation programs must show a 77 percent rate of survival at one year among their patients to be accredited to receive Medicare funds. We believe this may place physicians in the ethically compromising position of havi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 1992-02, Vol.326 (6), p.413-413 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To the Editor:
Under new Health Care Financing Administration rules, liver-transplantation programs must show a 77 percent rate of survival at one year among their patients to be accredited to receive Medicare funds. We believe this may place physicians in the ethically compromising position of having to choose between program accreditation and patient treatment.
This leads us to three observations. First, the social contract of American medicine presupposes that the doctor is the patient's advocate, not an advocate for society against patients whose care is costly or patients whose condition is such that the doctor cannot be sure that procedures . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJM199202063260613 |