Comparison of tissue culture and animal models for assessment of Cryptospridium parvum infection

The current increased interest for using tissue culture as a surrogate for mouse infection to assess Cryptospridium viability suggests that a comparison of the two models is essential for data interpretation. Therefore, a need remains for a statistical comparison that can demonstrate if infection an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental parasitology 2002-06, Vol.101 (2), p.97-106
Hauptverfasser: Slifko, Theresa R, Huffman, Debra E, Dussert, Bertrand, Owens, James H, Jakubowski, Walter, Haas, Charles N, Rose, Joan B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The current increased interest for using tissue culture as a surrogate for mouse infection to assess Cryptospridium viability suggests that a comparison of the two models is essential for data interpretation. Therefore, a need remains for a statistical comparison that can demonstrate if infection and inactivation predicted by new tissue culture models are comparable with those predicted by animal models. Data from a total of 31 dose–response trials using both tissue culture and mouse models to assess C. parvum infectivity were compared. The dose needed to infect 50% of the tissue cultures (ID 50) was also compared to each ID 50 in mice. Average ID 50s developed using the logit dose–response method for tissue culture and mice were 8 and 107, respectively, suggesting that tissue culture was more sensitive to infection. However, correlation ( r) between tissue culture and mouse infectivity was statistically significant (0.9167 [95% CI=0.8428 to 0.9594, p
ISSN:0014-4894
1090-2449
DOI:10.1016/S0014-4894(02)00100-5