Comparison of tissue culture and animal models for assessment of Cryptospridium parvum infection
The current increased interest for using tissue culture as a surrogate for mouse infection to assess Cryptospridium viability suggests that a comparison of the two models is essential for data interpretation. Therefore, a need remains for a statistical comparison that can demonstrate if infection an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental parasitology 2002-06, Vol.101 (2), p.97-106 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The current increased interest for using tissue culture as a surrogate for mouse infection to assess
Cryptospridium viability suggests that a comparison of the two models is essential for data interpretation. Therefore, a need remains for a statistical comparison that can demonstrate if infection and inactivation predicted by new tissue culture models are comparable with those predicted by animal models. Data from a total of 31 dose–response trials using both tissue culture and mouse models to assess
C. parvum infectivity were compared. The dose needed to infect 50% of the tissue cultures (ID
50) was also compared to each ID
50 in mice. Average ID
50s developed using the logit dose–response method for tissue culture and mice were 8 and 107, respectively, suggesting that tissue culture was more sensitive to infection. However, correlation (
r) between tissue culture and mouse infectivity was statistically significant (0.9167 [95% CI=0.8428 to 0.9594,
p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0014-4894 1090-2449 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0014-4894(02)00100-5 |