Seeking psychological treatment as a cure for a medical problem

Today health care providers are more likely to experience legal, moral and ethical dilemmas regarding their treatment principles given the climate of health care. Clinical practice in the United States is being affected by many external forces which can affect patient care. Government and insurance companies are attempting to legislate treatment as evidenced by DRG's and reimbursement patterns. Hospital and clinic administrators are pressuring faculty and staff to increase revenue by participating in more income generating activities. Within this milieu of dwindling resources, consumers continue to demand a variety of health care services. A case example of a woman who asked for a psychological intervention to treat a medical condition is presented. This case focuses on the important issue of offering efficacious treatments to informed patients with carefully diagnosed disorders. Whether scientific, ethically-based treatments are being rendered when any of the criteria, efficacious, informed and diagnosed are altered or missing, is open to doubt. This case is presented, not as a model of clinical management, but rather to stimulate discussion and generate ideas on how to better address future situations: (a) Where the patient requests an available treatment for a problem which would not be directly helped by such treatment; (b) how far must a clinician go to insure that informed consent has been reached?; (c) what is the physician's responsibility in providing what a patient wants in the way of treatment?; and (d) conversely, should clinicians provide medical interventions (at the patient's insistence) for psychological problems, for example, provide a penile prosthetic implant to a man whose disorder is clearly psychogenic impotence?