Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin in patients undergoing dialysis

Objective The aim of this multicenter, randomized, open‐label study was to compare the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of darbepoetin alfa, a new erythropoiesis‐stimulating protein, and recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin) after repeated intravenous dosing in patients with chronic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics 2002-11, Vol.72 (5), p.546-555
Hauptverfasser: Allon, Michael, Kleinman, Kenneth, Walczyk, Michael, Kaupke, Charles, Messer‐Mann, Louise, Olson, Kurt, Heatherington, Anne C., Maroni, Bradley J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective The aim of this multicenter, randomized, open‐label study was to compare the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of darbepoetin alfa, a new erythropoiesis‐stimulating protein, and recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin) after repeated intravenous dosing in patients with chronic kidney disease receiving hemodialysis. Methods Forty‐seven patients were randomized to receive darbepoetin alfa administered once weekly (n = 17) or 3 times weekly (n = 15) or epoetin administered 3 times weekly (n = 15) for up to 52 weeks. Pharmacokinetic profiles were measured during weeks 1 and 12 and at hemoglobin steady state (defined as a hemoglobin concentration within the target range for 4 consecutive weeks after week 12 with no change in study drug dose) or between weeks 36 and 40, whichever occurred first. Results At each of the 3 time points evaluated, the terminal half‐life of darbepoetin alfa was 2 to 3 times longer and the clearance approximately 4 times slower than those of epoetin. At week 12, the terminal half‐life was 23.4 hours with darbepoetin alfa once weekly, 18.3 hours with darbepoetin alfa 3 times weekly, and 8.0 hours with epoetin 3 times weekly. The pharmacokinetics of darbepoetin alfa was not dependent on dose or time. Mean hemoglobin values at steady state were all approximately 11 g/dL, within the target range of 9.0 to 13.0 g/dL. Safety analyses revealed no differences between darbepoetin alfa and epoetin. Conclusions The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles and safety data for darbepoetin alfa demonstrate that it can be administered less frequently than epoetin in patients with chronic kidney disease receiving hemodialysis, thus simplifying anemia management. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2002) 72, 546–555; doi: 10.1067/mcp.2002.128374
ISSN:0009-9236
1532-6535
DOI:10.1067/mcp.2002.128374