Body size, locomotion, and long bone cross-sectional geometry in indriid primates

The geometry of the midshaft cross‐sections of the femur and humerus of five indriid species was analysed. Internal (marrow cavity) and external diameters were measured on X‐rays in the anteroposterior (a‐p) and mediolateral (m‐l) planes; cross‐sectional areas, second moments of area, and section moduli were calculated using formulae for a hollow ellipse. Cortical thickness, robusticity indices (relating external diameters to the length of the bones), and a‐p/m‐l shape variables were also calculated. Model II regression was supplemented by analyses of correlation between size and shape. Indriids are saltatory, i.e., their locomotion is dominated by the hind limbs. Accordingly, the femur is more rigid than the humerus, and it shows a consistent difference between the a‐p and m‐l planes in measures related to bending strength. Cortical thickness varies considerably both within and across species. The type specimen of the new species Propithecus tattersalli is virtually indistinguishable from P. verreauxi on the basis of its long bone cross‐sectional geometry. Femoral robusticity is uncorrelated with size, but humeral robusticity decreases significantly with increasing size. Femoral shape variables (a‐p/m‐l) are all negatively correlated with body size, indicating that m‐l dimensions of the femur increase at a faster rate than do a‐p dimensions. The highly loaded plane of movement seems to be more reinforced in the smaller species. Contrary to static biomechanical scaling predictions of positive allometry, all cross‐sectional parameters scale relatively close to isometry. It is concluded that either changes in locomotor performance must compensate for the weight‐related, increase in forces and moments or that the larger‐bodied animals operate appreciably closer to the limits of their safety margins.