Biomechanics of femoral interlocking nails
Today there is a variety of different interlocking intramedullary nail designs available for the femur. We compared different nail types in the bone implant complex (BIC) of four unreamed solid nails and a slotted reamed nail with simulated comminuted mid shaft fractures to see if there are major di...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Injury 2000-07, Vol.31 (6), p.437-443 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Today there is a variety of different interlocking intramedullary nail designs available for the femur. We compared different nail types in the bone implant complex (BIC) of four unreamed solid nails and a slotted reamed nail with simulated comminuted mid shaft fractures to see if there are major differences in stiffness for axial load, bending and torsion. The fractures were simulated by a 2 cm defect osteotomy in paired human cadaver femora. Each bone was tested intact in a universal testing machine, osteotomy and osteosynthesis were performed, and the BIC was tested. Relative stiffness was calculated. In torque testing the unslotted solid nail showed significantly more stiffness (0.6–1.8 Nm/°) compared to the slotted nail (0.2 Nm/°). Compared to intact bone (6.9 Nm/°), both groups of nails were significantly less stiff (relative stiffness 2–20%). In axial load and bending testing the large diameter unreamed nail showed significantly higher stiffness (32–68%). This study shows that stiffness of bone implant complex in interlocking femoral nails is more dependent on nail profile than on the pressfit of nails in the medullary canal. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0020-1383 1879-0267 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0020-1383(00)00019-X |