Comparison of several spray chambers operating at very low liquid flow rates in inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry

Four different spray chambers were evaluated in ICP-AES at very low liquid flow rates: a double-pass (Scott type), a conventional cyclonic, and two low-volume cyclonic-type spray chambers (i.e., Cinnabar and Genie). A glass concentric pneumatic micro nebulizer (Atom Mist) was used in conjunction with all four chambers. The liquid flow rate was varied from 10 to 160 microL min(-1). The conventional cyclonic spray chamber gave rise to coarser tertiary aerosols, higher analyte and solvent transport rates, higher sensitivity and lower limits of detection than the remaining ones. The low-volume spray chambers afforded analytical figures of merit similar to the double-pass one, despite their very different designs. However, these spray chambers exhibited shorter wash-out times. The matrix effects were significant only for the double-pass. This fact allowed the analysis of reference samples by employing aqueous standards at a minimum level of sample consumption. The recoveries obtained for the cyclonic spray chambers and several certified samples were close to 100%, being always lower in the case of the double-pass spray chamber.