Comparable implantation rates with fresh vs frozen embryo transfer suggests that controlled ovarian hyperstimulation has an adverse effect on conception outcome
A retrospective comparison of fresh vs frozen embryo pregnancy rates. All frozen embryos transferred used in the analysis including deselected embryos from the oocyte retrieval cycle, and twice-frozen embryos. Pregnancy and implantation rates following fresh or frozen embryo transfers were similar....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology 2000, Vol.27 (3-4), p.173-175 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A retrospective comparison of fresh vs frozen embryo pregnancy rates.
All frozen embryos transferred used in the analysis including deselected embryos from the oocyte retrieval cycle, and twice-frozen embryos.
Pregnancy and implantation rates following fresh or frozen embryo transfers were similar.
The similar outcomes despite the obvious disadvantages for the frozen-thawed embryo suggests that some other factor reduces the chance of embryo implantation on oocyte-retrieval cycles. An adverse affect of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on the uterine environment is a strong possibility. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0390-6663 |