Comparison of two rapid Streptococcus pyogenes diagnostic tests with a rigorous culture standard

BACKGROUND.Comparisons of rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of Streptococcus pyogenes pharyngitis are often made between published studies but may not be reliable given differences in study design, sampling and reference standard definitions. Tests are rarely compared against each other in a single study. METHODS.The sensitivity and specificity of two S. pyogenes rapid diagnostic tests were compared against a multiplate culture standard defined as the identification of S. pyogenes on any of four culture plates. Paired swabs were tested for S. pyogenes antigen using Genzyme’s OSOM Ultra Strep A Test and compared with Biostar’s Strep A OIA Max Test. RESULTS.Ninety-four (31.1%) of 302 matched samples were identified with S. pyogenes. The sensitivity of Genzyme’s OSOM Ultra Strep A Test against the multiplate culture standard was 92.6%, significantly higher (P = 0.001) than that (75.5%) of Biostar’s Strep A OIA Max Test. Specificities were 92.8 and 97.1%, respectively. Data analysis of culture results and statistical modeling showed that cultures of two or more samples are necessary for a sensitivity of 95% or greater for a comparison standard compared with true disease status. CONCLUSIONS.When comparing the performance of rapid antigen tests for S. pyogenes pharyngitis, a rigorous culture standard should be used consisting of at least two separate samples (swabs and/or pledgets), ultimately plated on selective agar. Genzyme’s OSOM Ultra Strep A Test was significantly more sensitive than Biostar’s Strep A OIA Max Test in comparison with a multiplate culture standard and a same swab, single plate culture standard.