Field of view affects reaching, not grasping

It has been observed that wearing goggles that restrict the field of view (FOV) causes familiar objects to appear both smaller and nearer. To investigate this further, we examined the effect of a range of field sizes (4 degrees, 8 degrees, 16 degrees, 32 degrees and 64 degrees) on estimates of objec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental brain research 2000-12, Vol.135 (3), p.411-416
Hauptverfasser: WATT, Simon J, BRADSHAW, Mark F, RUSHTON, Simon K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:It has been observed that wearing goggles that restrict the field of view (FOV) causes familiar objects to appear both smaller and nearer. To investigate this further, we examined the effect of a range of field sizes (4 degrees, 8 degrees, 16 degrees, 32 degrees and 64 degrees) on estimates of object distance and object size used to control reaching and grasping movements of binocular observers. No visual or haptic feedback was available during the experiment. It was found that, as the FOV was decreased, the distance reached by subjects also decreased, whereas the size of their grasp was unaffected. In a second experiment, we compared reaching and grasping responses under binocular and monocular conditions for 8 degrees and 64 degrees field sizes and show that the effects of FOV do not result from the progressive loss of binocular information. We conclude that reducing the FOV produces substantial and dissociable effects on reaching and grasping behaviour and that field size must be taken into account in any context where visuo-motor performance is important.
ISSN:0014-4819
1432-1106
DOI:10.1007/s002210000545