Divergent mechanisms for phototransduction of invertebrate microvillar photoreceptors
Recently, it was reported that the polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), arachidonic acid (AA) and linolenic acid (LNA), activate the light-sensitive channels in Drosophila photoreceptors (Chyb et al. 1999). We have examined whether these PUFAs activate the light-sensitive channels in Limulus ventral...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Visual neuroscience 2000-11, Vol.17 (6), p.911-917 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Recently, it was reported that the polyunsaturated fatty
acids (PUFAs), arachidonic acid (AA) and linolenic acid
(LNA), activate the light-sensitive channels in Drosophila
photoreceptors (Chyb et al. 1999). We have examined whether
these PUFAs activate the light-sensitive channels in Limulus
ventral photoreceptors. We find that, whether applied from
the outside or injected into a Limulus ventral
photoreceptor, either AA or LNA fails to activate the light-sensitive
channels. Moreover, the synthetic diacylglycerol analog,
1-oleoyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycerol, also fails to activate the
light-sensitive channels. We suggest that these findings
require us to rethink our view about the generality of
the process of phototransduction in invertebrate microvillar
photoreceptors. We propose that the photoreceptors of Drosophila
and Limulus evolved to utilize different branches
of the phosphoinositide pathway for phototransduction:
those of Limulus evolved to utilize IP3-mediated
calcium release while those of Drosophila evolved
to utilize diacylglycerol and it's downstream products. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0952-5238 1469-8714 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S0952523800176102 |