Mobile phones and the illusory pursuit of safety
At present it is difficult to make a logical case for more stringent limits on exposure to pulsed microwave radiation. Robust limits are based on either a direct quantitative link between cause and effect (eg, thermal heating) or on a proven causative mechanism supported by dose-effect relations, as...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet (British edition) 2000-11, Vol.356 (9244), p.1782-1783 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | At present it is difficult to make a logical case for more stringent limits on exposure to pulsed microwave radiation. Robust limits are based on either a direct quantitative link between cause and effect (eg, thermal heating) or on a proven causative mechanism supported by dose-effect relations, as found with ionising radiation. Neither is available for these postulated very-low-intensity effects; the process of ionisation and free-radical formation that is known to be the basis of cancer induction with, say, X rays, does not occur with electromagnetic radiation in the microwave frequency range. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03223-2 |