Cognitive modulation of midbrain function: task-induced reduction of the pupillary light reflex

The activation of processing resources has widespread effects in the nervous system. A model of pupillary control systems (Steinhauer S.R., Hakerem G., 1992. The pupillary response in cognitive psychophysiology and schizophrenia. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 658, 182–204) had predicted that ongoing cognitiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of psychophysiology 2000-12, Vol.39 (1), p.21-30
Hauptverfasser: Steinhauer, Stuart R, Condray, Ruth, Kasparek, Annette
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The activation of processing resources has widespread effects in the nervous system. A model of pupillary control systems (Steinhauer S.R., Hakerem G., 1992. The pupillary response in cognitive psychophysiology and schizophrenia. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 658, 182–204) had predicted that ongoing cognitive activation should result in inhibition of the light reaction at the level of the oculomotor nucleus, n. III, in the midbrain. In this study, modification of parameters of the pupillary reaction to light were examined during varying task demands. The averaged light reaction was recorded from 33 male and female healthy volunteers during the performance of a serial 7 subtraction task and compared to a ‘no task’ condition. For 13 subjects, an additional verbalization task with little processing demand (add 1) also was presented. Two types of effects were observed. Firstly, the tonic pupil diameter increased from the no task to the easy (add 1) task, and increased further in the more demanding condition (subtract 7). Secondly, the extent of the phasic light reaction was significantly reduced and the latency at the end of the contraction was significantly decreased in the ‘subtract 7’ condition compared to both the no task and easy conditions (which did not differ from each other). The locus of interference with the light reaction was the Edinger–Westphal complex of the oculomotor nucleus, which is the motor center for the pupillary sphincter muscles. Descending cortical influences inhibited the activity of the Edinger-Westphal complex. Thus, increasing activation had a tonic inhibitory effect on this center, while higher levels of processing complexity produced a separate component of inhibition that interacted with dynamic activation at this midbrain site. It was suggested that the variation in the light reaction is quantitatively responsive to varying processing loads, and may be utilized as a sensitive metric for a wide variety of cognitive operations.
ISSN:0167-8760
1872-7697
DOI:10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00119-7