Relation Between Hospital Primary Angioplasty Volume and Mortality for Patients With Acute MI Treated With Primary Angioplasty vs Thrombolytic Therapy
CONTEXT Institutional experience with primary angioplasty has been suggested as a factor in selecting a reperfusion strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, no large studies have directly compared outcomes of primary angioplasty vs thrombolytic therapy as a function of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2000-12, Vol.284 (24), p.3131-3138 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | CONTEXT Institutional experience with primary angioplasty has been suggested
as a factor in selecting a reperfusion strategy for patients with acute myocardial
infarction (AMI). However, no large studies have directly compared outcomes
of primary angioplasty vs thrombolytic therapy as a function of institutional
experience. OBJECTIVE To compare outcomes among patients with AMI who were treated with primary
angioplasty vs thrombolytic therapy at hospitals with different volumes of
primary angioplasty. DESIGN Retrospective cohort. SETTING A total of 446 acute care hospitals with 112 classified as low volume
(≤16 procedures), 223 as intermediate volume (17-48 procedures), and 111
as high volume (≥49 procedures) based on their annual primary angioplasty
volume. PATIENTS A total of 62 299 patients with AMI treated with primary angioplasty
or thrombolytic therapy from June 1, 1994, through July 31, 1999. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE In-hospital mortality. RESULTS Mortality was lower among patients who received primary angioplasty
compared with those who received thrombolysis at hospitals with intermediate
volumes (4.5% vs 5.9%; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0098-7484 1538-3598 |
DOI: | 10.1001/jama.284.24.3131 |