Endocrine pharmacological characterization of progesterone antagonists and progesterone receptor modulators with respect to PR-agonistic and antagonistic activity

Studies were conducted to assess progesterone antagonists (PAs) and progesterone receptor modulators (PRMs) with respect to PR agonistic and antagonistic activities in vivo. These properties are not always adequately reflected in transactivation in vitro models. Studies were performed in pregnant ra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Steroids 2000-10, Vol.65 (10), p.713-723
Hauptverfasser: Elger, Walter, Bartley, Julia, Schneider, Birgitt, Kaufmann, Günther, Schubert, Gerd, Chwalisz, Kristof
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Studies were conducted to assess progesterone antagonists (PAs) and progesterone receptor modulators (PRMs) with respect to PR agonistic and antagonistic activities in vivo. These properties are not always adequately reflected in transactivation in vitro models. Studies were performed in pregnant rats, estrogen-primed rabbits (McPhail -Test), and cycling and pregnant guinea pigs. Tested compounds included mifepristone (RU486), onapristone, J867, J956, J1042, and ZK137316. J-compounds induced sub-maximum endometrial transformation and, paradoxically, inhibited effects of progesterone in rabbits. Mifepristone, onapristone, and ZK137316 behaved as ‘pure’ antagonists in this species. Inhibition of uterine PGF 2α secretion and inhibition of luteolysis in cycling guinea pigs were more sensitive parameters of PR-agonistic and antagonistic properties. ‘Pure’ PAs inhibited uterine PGF 2α secretion and luteal regression completely. The PR agonist R5020 reversed both effects which demonstrates a PR mediation. Agonistic PRMs (J-substances and mifepristone) showed no or blunted antiluteolytic effects compared to the ‘pure’ PR antagonist onapristone. When tested in pregnant guinea pigs for their labor-inducing potential, PR agonistic PRMs had much reduced or abolished abortifacient activity compared to mifepristone (mifepristone > J956 > J867/J912 > J1042). However, in cycling animals, superior antiovulatory and antiproliferative properties of the J-substances were seen. Antiovulatory effects of ‘pure’ and agonistic PRMs are probably due to different mechanisms. The relevance of rodent studies for antiovulatory and uterine antiproliferative effects for the human is still uncertain. The non-abortifacient PRM J1042 induced stromal compaction and inhibition of endometrial proliferation in monkeys, but this effect was not stronger than that of the ‘purer’ PAs. ‘Pure’ PAs are important pharmacological tools analogous to PRKO models to study the role of PR in the menstrual cycle and in pregnancy.
ISSN:0039-128X
1878-5867
DOI:10.1016/S0039-128X(00)00178-1