Two methods for quantifying DNA extracted from poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres
DNA can be formulated with synthetic polymers such as poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLG) to generate microparticles. Researchers have used either UV spectroscopy or fluorometry with PicoGreen ® dye to quantify PLG-encapsulated DNA. While the sensitivity of DNA detection and quantification by PicoGreen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of controlled release 2000-12, Vol.69 (3), p.337-344 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | DNA can be formulated with synthetic polymers such as poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLG) to generate microparticles. Researchers have used either UV spectroscopy or fluorometry with PicoGreen
® dye to quantify PLG-encapsulated DNA. While the sensitivity of DNA detection and quantification by PicoGreen is higher (∼12 pg/ml) compared to UV (∼0.5 μg/ml), each method as an analytical tool has limitations. The premise of this work addresses the usefulness and limitations of each method to determine encapsulation efficiencies in PLG microspheres post-process, and to quantify release of DNA from microspheres during in vitro release experiments. In addition, assay conditions for accurate and reproducible extraction of DNA from PLG microspheres using a biphasic (aqueous/organic) solvent system are described. It was also determined that residual poly(vinyl alcohol) and DNA isoforms (linear, nicked, supercoiled) affected PicoGreen/DNA fluorescence values. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0168-3659 1873-4995 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0168-3659(00)00308-4 |