Two methods for quantifying DNA extracted from poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres

DNA can be formulated with synthetic polymers such as poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLG) to generate microparticles. Researchers have used either UV spectroscopy or fluorometry with PicoGreen ® dye to quantify PLG-encapsulated DNA. While the sensitivity of DNA detection and quantification by PicoGreen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of controlled release 2000-12, Vol.69 (3), p.337-344
Hauptverfasser: Barman, Shikha P, Lunsford, Lynn, Chambers, Patricia, Hedley, Mary Lynne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:DNA can be formulated with synthetic polymers such as poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLG) to generate microparticles. Researchers have used either UV spectroscopy or fluorometry with PicoGreen ® dye to quantify PLG-encapsulated DNA. While the sensitivity of DNA detection and quantification by PicoGreen is higher (∼12 pg/ml) compared to UV (∼0.5 μg/ml), each method as an analytical tool has limitations. The premise of this work addresses the usefulness and limitations of each method to determine encapsulation efficiencies in PLG microspheres post-process, and to quantify release of DNA from microspheres during in vitro release experiments. In addition, assay conditions for accurate and reproducible extraction of DNA from PLG microspheres using a biphasic (aqueous/organic) solvent system are described. It was also determined that residual poly(vinyl alcohol) and DNA isoforms (linear, nicked, supercoiled) affected PicoGreen/DNA fluorescence values.
ISSN:0168-3659
1873-4995
DOI:10.1016/S0168-3659(00)00308-4