Effects of visceral distension on the activities of neurones receiving cutaneous inputs in the rat lumbar dorsal horn; comparison with effects of remote noxious somatic stimuli

(1) Unitary extracellular recordings were made from 92 lumbar dorsal horn neurones in urethane-anaesthetised rats. These neurones were classed as ‘noxious-only’ (4), ‘non-noxious-only’ (33) or ‘convergent’ (55) by their responses to stimulation of their cutaneous receptive fields on the ipsilateral hindpaw. (2) Distension of abdominal viscera (colon, urinary bladder) depressed the activities of the vast majority (93%) of the convergent neurones but of only one other cell (a non-noxious-only neurone). Similarly, noxious stimulation of widespread somatic structures depressed activity in all but one of the convergent neurones but in only 3 other cells (one non-noxious- and two noxious-only neurones). One or other of these procedures also excited 3 cells — one convergent neurone responding to distension of the colon, another to stimulation of widespread somatic structures and one non-noxious-only neurone being excited by stimulation on the contralateral hindpaw. (3) The inhibitory effects of the noxious somatic stimuli were very like those described previously and termed ‘diffuse noxious inhibitory controls’ (DNIC) and it seems likely that the effects of the visceral stimuli were also manifestations of DNIC, particularly in view of their similar, nearly total, specificity to convergent neurones. There were however, some small differences in the extent and temporal evolution of the inhibitory effects of the visceral and of the somatic stimuli — the visceral stimuli generally producing weaker inhibitions with slower rates of onset and recovery. It is proposed that these differences may have reflected different amounts and patterns of activity in the relevant primary afferent fibres rather than being due to different central neural mechanisms. (4) These results and the likely explanation that the effects of the visceral stimuli were mediated by a diffuse mechanism should be taken into account when interpreting the results of other studies in which inhibitory effects are produced by visceral stimulation.