Electrochemiluminescent Metallopolymer Coatings:  Combined Light and Current Detection in Flow Injection Analysis

The application of thin films of the metallopolymer [Ru(bpy)2PVP10]2+ for the electrochemiluminescent (ECL) detection of oxalate in a flow injection analysis system is reported, where bpy is 2,2‘-bipyridyl and PVP is poly(4-vinylpyridine). Immobilization of the ECL reagent means that it can be regen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Analytical chemistry (Washington) 2000-11, Vol.72 (22), p.5576-5582
Hauptverfasser: Forster, Robert J, Hogan, Conor F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The application of thin films of the metallopolymer [Ru(bpy)2PVP10]2+ for the electrochemiluminescent (ECL) detection of oxalate in a flow injection analysis system is reported, where bpy is 2,2‘-bipyridyl and PVP is poly(4-vinylpyridine). Immobilization of the ECL reagent means that it can be regenerated in situ, eliminating the need to constantly deliver it to the reaction zone. Electrochemically generated Ru3+ reacts with the analyte to form the excited-state [Ru2+]*, which luminesces at 610 nm. The reaction is optimal at low pH, where the layer is swollen and homogeneous charge transport through the layer is more facile. Unlike traditional approaches, we simultaneously monitor both the amperometric and luminescent response of the modified electrode. The precision of both signals is similar at ∼2% (n = 10). However, the ECL response has a larger dynamic range extending from the low-micromolar to higmillimolar range and a lower limit of detection, ∼0.2 μM or 4 pmol of oxalate injected. The ECL approach displays excellent selectivity for oxalate over a wide range of potential interferences including oxygen, amines, iron sulfate, ammonium nitrate, urea, and glucose. Ascorbic acid represents the most significant ECL interference. However, the signal observed for a 1 mM solution of ascorbic acid is still only 2.6% of the response observed for the injection of a similar concentration of oxalate.
ISSN:0003-2700
1520-6882
DOI:10.1021/ac000605d