The Effects of Fellow Patients on the Emotional Well-Being and Satisfaction with Care of Postoperative Cosmetic Surgery Patients

This article reports the findings of a quasi-experimental study that represents the first attempt to systematically examine the possibility that contact with fellow patients after cosmetic surgery significantly influences a patientʼs postoperative emotional well-being and satisfaction with care. Pat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2000-11, Vol.106 (6), p.1407-1414
Hauptverfasser: Kulik, James A, Shelby, Debra, Cooper, Robert N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This article reports the findings of a quasi-experimental study that represents the first attempt to systematically examine the possibility that contact with fellow patients after cosmetic surgery significantly influences a patientʼs postoperative emotional well-being and satisfaction with care. Patients were assigned to rooms that either facilitated ample postoperative contact with other patients (n = 70) or to rooms that were physically located in a manner that afforded little inter-patient contact (n = 9). The results indicate that whereas postoperative depression levels did not differ, patients in the high-patient-contact condition experienced less postoperative anxiety and greater overall satisfaction with their quality of care than did patients in the low-patient-contact condition. Analyses of patientsʼ reported postoperative affiliations suggest several additional benefits of inter-patient contact, such as added emotional support, reduction of uncertainty about what to expect, and the opportunity to compare progress and emotional reactions. The results are consistent with a growing literature that suggests fellow patients can and do serve a useful, adjunctive role in health care. Questions for future research are considered. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1061407, 2000.)
ISSN:0032-1052
1529-4242
DOI:10.1097/00006534-200011000-00032